top of page
Search

Who Will Vote For Trees?

3 hours ago
3 min read

In July 2026, Terrasse-Vaudreuil, a small Quebec town, made international headlines. And no, it wasn’t the result of murder and mayhem or a catastrophic flood. The headlines were about a remarkable resolution passed by its town council, making Terrasse-Vaudreuil the

first city in the world to recognize the rights of trees.


The town’s resolution, based on the Universal Declaration of Tree Rights crafted in France

by La Compagnie des Papillons Bleus and author Ricardo Rey, recognizes that trees have

the right to exist, thrive and receive protections under the law.


I was blown away when I heard about it. I was even more impressed when I read the words

of the town’s mayor, Michel Bordeau, who affirmed that trees were not merely the backdrop for his community. They were “indispensable allies for our health, our climate resilience, and our quality of life.”


In other words, trees not only have an inherent right to life but also the right to have their

lives protected because of the extraordinary benefits they provide, from storing carbon and

providing habitat to offsetting heat islands and super-storms.


Needless to say, it’s an idea that is anathema to some and music to the ears of many

others.


That’s because trees, like all elements of the natural world, have been seen historically, and legally, as property - a treasure trove of resources just waiting to be cut down, dug up and exploited. And - surprise, surprise! - those who own land and benefit from “nature as property” don’t want the rules of the game changed.


Clear cuts like this one are now standard practice for developers that own forested city properties
Clear cuts like this one are now standard practice for developers that own forested city properties


By contrast, others who support the idea of nature being imbued with inalienable rights

maintain that if a corporation is viewed as an individual under the law, with all the rights

that implies, then why not trees, a river or an entire rainforest? Especially now in an era of

climate chaos and catastrophic nature loss.


The political battle between these two opposing points of view is being waged, in one form or another, at almost every level of government, including the city level.


In fact, here in Winnipeg, it’s playing out right now, during the civic election, as Trees Please

Winnipeg - an organization I belong to - challenges candidates for council and mayor to

sign what we’re calling “The Save the Shade “Pledge.We’re not asking the city to recognize universal tree rights.


What we are asking them to do is everything in their power to protect as many of our mature trees and forests as possible, on both public and private land, because of the essential life-sustaining services they provide to everyone.


And believe me when I say that this isn’t our first go-round on the issue. Ever since the city

adopted its 20 Year Urban Forestry Strategy in 2023, Trees Please has been pushing council

to do what the strategy recommended. That is, enact bylaws governing mature tree

removals and the clear cutting of our riparian and aspen/oak forests on both public and

private land.


And what has the city done? Well, to say it’s been stalling for the past 2 years would be an

understatement. Indeed their most recent reason for doing nothing boils down to council’s

belief that it can’t act to protect trees on private land, unless the province changes the city

charter.


Really? By my reading, the charter clearly states that council and the mayor are responsible for the health, safety and wellbeing of their citizens. It’s also crystal clear about the city’s responsibility for the environmental impact of all development projects.


So, don’t those 2 clauses alone give them the power to enact a private tree bylaw?


Well, as it turns out two similar clauses in Edmonton’s city charter were used to pressure

their council into drafting a private tree bylaw, which is now in the works. And guess what?

Prior to that, Edmonton had been stalling, using the same charter change excuse that our

mayor and council are now using.


This when between 80% to 90% of Winnipeg’s 3 million trees sit on privately owned land

with no protection, and more than 20 other municipalities nationwide already have private

tree bylaws in place to protect their canopies.


So, head over to Trees Please Winnipeg’s website and check out which candidates have

signed our pledge and those who haven’t. Then take a look at the candidate’s broader

platform.


You just might discover that candidates who care about trees are also the ones who care

most about you and your neighbourhood.


Then, on October 28th, vote for trees and candidates who, like the mayor of Terrasse

Vaudreuil, see them not just as a pretty backdrop, but as indispensable allies that protect our health, safety and environment.



Find out more about the Save the Shade pledge campaign and which candidates for mayor and council have signed on at: https://treespleasewinnipeg.com/election-action-2026/

 
 
 

Comments


Drop Me a Line, Let Me Know What You Think

Thanks for submitting!

© 2023 by Train of Thought. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page