Don’t Let Fear Of Change Determine Your Vote
- Jun 6
- 3 min read
Updated: Jun 13

It is a truth universally acknowledged that human beings don’t just dislike change; we fear it.
And that’s as true for moving house as it is for getting a divorce or ousting a political incumbent.
That’s because our brains are hardwired to seek comfort and security, not uncertainty.
We may not be happy with a person or situation, but at least they’re familiar. So we stick with it, whether it be an unhappy marriage, a job that we hate or a politician who doesn’t reflect our values.
That way there’s no need to cope with the fear of the unknown.
But here’s the thing – fear of change can wind up making you miserable and doesn’t allow much room for growth. And in politics it can lead to the kind of complacency that virtually guarantees that a leader who doesn’t align with your values remains in office term after term.
“Better the devil you know than the devil you don’t,” seems to be the mantra of far too many
voters.
But if you actually listen to what a candidate says, or better still, seek out information on
their background and election platform, you might just find one who does align with your
values.
So, for example, if you value a city that’s greener, more livable, and inclusive - one that’s as good for your kids as it is for your aging mother - why would you vote for a mayor or councillor who are more concerned with suburban expansion and using your hard earned tax dollars to build new and wider roads?
Why would you vote for a mayor who spent more than $340 million or 25% of the city
budget on police services and less than $1 million to help the more than 8000 people living
in insecure housing, shelters or on the street. Not to mention the 10s of 1000s of housed,
low income families who are currently accessing food banks every month.
And if you believe in democracy, why would you vote for a mayor who has consolidated
power in his own office and ensured that his executive policy committee happily does his
bidding? A scenario which leaves ten other councillors, including those who may even align
with your values, largely locked out of the decision-making process.

In other words, why would you re-elect Scott Gillingham and the councillors that support
his policies? Or worse, assume that his re-election is somehow inevitable?
Beats me, because the first time around, Gillingham won by the skin of his teeth. So why
would you vote for him this time, if you didn’t vote for him in the last election?
Will you vote for him because he opened up Portage and Main, hiked property taxes, and
the price tag on water and waste? Tax increases that won’t fund social programs or efforts
to green of our city but will be used to pay for new roads and more cops to patrol them.So, if you didn’t vote in the 2022 civic election maybe you should consider doing it this Fall.
Because the reality is we tend to get the governments we don’t want, when we don’t vote.
And, please, don’t trot out those old saws about how your vote won’t make a difference or
that the re-election of an incumbent is a done deal, or worse, that you just don’t care about
politics.
As a recent meme observed, saying you don’t care about politics simply means” This isn’t
hurting me yet, and I don’t care if it’s hurting you.”

And the truth is this city is hurting, whether measured by its lack of greenness, its
homelessness statistics, its plethora of potholes, parking lots and polluted rivers or the
endless line ups at food banks.
But wait, I hear you say. How much can the mayor or city council actually do to fix those
problems, when they don’t have the power to take on big issues like poverty or climate
change or energy and food costs?
To which I would respond, read the City Charter. Once you do, you’ll soon discover that the mayor and council have remarkable discretionary powers when it comes to enacting
bylaws and resolutions aimed at the protection and well-being of its people.
They just don’t use them.
So, if you care about building a just and livable city, then please, put aside your fears, give a little time or money to a candidate you can support, or better still, consider running for office.
And if you can’t afford to do that, at very least, ditch your anxiety and vote for change in the upcoming civic election.



Someone is on target and i have to ask why we continue to stick with people at the political level who ignore rational thinking and practical approaches. I think you hit many topics that need change and it ain't with more taxes, a wider Kenaston when you have Pembina HWY, Waverley and shaftesbury running parallel; a city full of potholes remaining, not all lanes painted and the continuation of 3rd world city streets. Why?